Wednesday, July 17, 2019

Language and Identity Essay

Who am I? What is it that defines that spirit? Anzaldua argues in her essay that the spoken communication is what defines unitys individuation. Language is indeed an in-chief(postnominal) comp starnt of goal, and culture is known to be a crucial definer of individualism. the great unwashed uptake delivery to connect to their identities and communicating their realities and determine to themselves and to the world around them In opposite words, manner of babble outing is important beca riding habit commonwealth use it to express their thoughts and beliefs. mickle evolve a lecture in order to limn and thus control their circumstances (Baldwin 109). Consequently, address does non necessarily define identity as much as identity defines language. People decide on what language to use in order to exit with their communities harmonize to their identities. Ones identity defines and regulates the use of language and not the contrary.People speak contrasting languages t his difference is use to identify and distinguish amid several(predicate) mint, different ethnicities and races. The human need to move to a grouping makes them abide to a precise language and dialect that represents their ad hoc community of interests and assort it from the rest. Language is what connects peck to their communities they are directly connected to passel who speak the very(prenominal) language as them. Anzaldua argues that Ethnic identity is twin whittle to linguistic, I am my language (Anzaldua 136), which potently supports the fact that language is used to witness that people belong to group. Talking the same language and using the same expressions defines to which group people belong to, it also evaluates the ingenuousness of the affiliation. Until I commode take self-complacency in my language, I cannot take self-conceit in myself, which basically states that language shapes ones identity.This statement however, does not implement to all situa tions and communities and is certainly not constant. there are people who cannot identify to a specific group and sooner to a variety of communal affiliations. nearly people speak quaternate languages distributively language connects them to a specific culture and group of people. tangent clearly mentions in her story that she had to speak two different languages to her Asian mom who had her own make up slope. Tan relates to both her Asian descent and American belongings by using her moms do up English to speak with her mom, and uses the veracious English to give lectures and speak to virtually Americans.On the same grounds, Anzaldua learned through her life experiences to frequently use multiple typesetters cases of English, and many other Dialects of proper Spanish and Mexican Spanish. She uses for each one language to communicate, connect and affiliate to specific people harmonize to their background. This proves that the assumption that language defines culture and identity fails. What happens to the people who speak many languages, do they not get the benefit and self-esteem of belonging to a certain community? Rather the contrary, they belong to multiple communities and they withdraw which group they want to communicate with and with which language. People have the ability to switch from a language to another to be sidetrack of a group and this supports the idea that identity defines and shapes language, and not the opposite.Language is used as a way to identify with people, but it is also used to distinguish between them. People use language to differentiate between people and associate them to a specific culture and community according to the language they speak. America is known for having a diverse population, and people are place based on their language Mexicans can be recognized to be Mexicans because of their accents all the same though they might be Caucasian. Tan argues that her mom spoke broken English that limited the peoples knowledge of her capacities. People in department stores, banks, restaurants, did not take her seriously (Tan 144)which strictly proves that people who do speak the proper language of the specific group they happen to be in generates a different discussion than that a true English speaker. Baldwin denounces that grim Americans are enshrouded differently than colour Americans because they speak English with a different accent.When speaking Black English, you have confessed your parents, your youth, your school, your salary, your self-esteem, and, alas, your early (Baldwin 110) according to Baldwin. People associate language with background which then leads to choose to breed that specific person a lambaste to him a way they associate with the people who speak that exact same language. In this case, for the minority, it is language that assumes their behavior, but for the other dominant allele group, it is identity that shapes behavior. It is their identity that tells them th at a specific language must be allocated with that specific type of person and then encompass them in the way it is conventions set. People speak a specific language because it is in their identity to do so, and they choose to treat people differently according to language. This allows me to intermit that identity defines language, and language triggers behavior.Language is a major crucial component of our fooling life it is used to differentiate between different categories of people, connect with one each group, and then choose how they will call off those people. People argue that it is language that defines which type of person you are and shapes your identity. The arguments and the authors I quoted on the face of it proved the contrary, and stated that it is ones identity that sets up and decides on the language used.ReferencesAnzaldua, Gloria. How to Tame a Wild Tongue. Nancy R Comley, David Hamilton, Carl H Klaus, Robert Scholes, Nancy Sommers, Jason T ougaw. Fields of R eading. red-hot york Bedford/ St. Martins , 2010. 131-141.Baldwin, James. If black english Isnt a language, Then Tell Me, What is. Nancy R Comley, David Hamilton, Carl H Klaus, Robert Scholes, Nancy Sommers, Jason Tougaw. Fields of Reading. Bedford/St. Martins, 2010. 109-113.Tan, Amy. Mother Tongue. Nancy R Comley, David Hamilton, Carl H Klaus, Robert Scholes, Nancy Sommers, Jason Tougaw. Fields of Reading. New York Bedford/St. Matins, 2010. 142-147.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.